Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

patch and prompt improvements #1091

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 4, 2024
Merged

patch and prompt improvements #1091

merged 2 commits into from
Aug 4, 2024

Conversation

mrT23
Copy link
Collaborator

@mrT23 mrT23 commented Aug 3, 2024 •
edited by codiumai-pr-agent-pro bot
Loading

PR Type

Enhancement, Documentation

Description

  • Enhanced the logic for processing new and old hunks in convert_to_hunks_with_lines_numbers function in git_patch_processing.py.
  • Updated the Docker base image from Python 3.10 to Python 3.12 in Dockerfile.
  • Improved clarity and added detailed instructions in code suggestion prompts, reflection prompts, and reviewer prompts in respective TOML files.

Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files
Enhancement
git_patch_processing.py
Enhance hunk processing logic and code readability             

pr_agent/algo/git_patch_processing.py

  • Improved handling of new and old hunks in patch processing.
  • Added checks for presence of '+' and '-' lines before appending hunks.
  • Fixed formatting issues and improved code readability.
    		•  +26/-19 
    Dependencies
    Dockerfile
    Update Docker base image to Python 3.12                                   

    docker/Dockerfile

    • Updated base image from Python 3.10 to Python 3.12.
    		 +1/-1     
    Documentation
    pr_code_suggestions_prompts.toml
    Improve code suggestion prompts and field descriptions     

    pr_agent/settings/pr_code_suggestions_prompts.toml

  • Improved clarity of code suggestion prompts.
  • Added instructions for handling hunks with no new or removed code.
  • Enhanced field descriptions for better understanding.
    		•  +13/-11 
    pr_code_suggestions_reflect_prompts.toml
    Enhance code suggestion reflection prompts                             

    pr_agent/settings/pr_code_suggestions_reflect_prompts.toml

  • Improved clarity of code suggestion reflection prompts.
  • Added instructions for handling hunks with no new or removed code.
    		•  +3/-3     
    pr_reviewer_prompts.toml
    Improve PR reviewer prompts and instructions                         

    pr_agent/settings/pr_reviewer_prompts.toml

  • Improved clarity of PR reviewer prompts.
  • Added instructions for handling hunks with no new or removed code.
    		•  +3/-2     

    💡 PR-Agent usage:
    Comment /help on the PR to get a list of all available PR-Agent tools and their descriptions

    @codiumai-pr-agent-pro codiumai-pr-agent-pro bot added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request Review effort [1-5]: 3 labels Aug 3, 2024
    @codiumai-pr-agent-pro CodiumAI PR-Agent Pro
    Copy link
    Contributor

    PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 3 🔵🔵🔵⚪⚪
    🏅 Score: 85
    🧪 No relevant tests
    🔒 No security concerns identified
    🔀 Multiple PR themes

    Sub-PR theme: Update Docker Base Image

    Relevant files:

    • docker/Dockerfile
    Sub-PR theme: Update Documentation and Prompts

    Relevant files:

    • pr_agent/settings/pr_code_suggestions_prompts.toml
    • pr_agent/settings/pr_code_suggestions_reflect_prompts.toml
    • pr_agent/settings/pr_reviewer_prompts.toml
    Sub-PR theme: Enhance Hunk Processing Logic

    Relevant files:

    • pr_agent/algo/git_patch_processing.py
    ⚡ Key issues to review

    Error Handling
    The use of a bare except: at line 229 should be replaced with more specific exception handling to avoid catching unexpected exceptions.

    Code Duplication
    The logic for processing new and old content lines (lines 206-216 and 245-255) is duplicated. Consider refactoring into a function to improve maintainability.

    @mrT23 mrT23 changed the title patch improvements patch and prompt improvements Aug 3, 2024
    @Codium-ai Codium-ai deleted a comment from codiumai-pr-agent-pro bot Aug 3, 2024
    @mrT23 mrT23 merged commit 2b77d07 into main Aug 4, 2024
    1 check passed
    @mrT23 mrT23 deleted the tr/patch_improvements branch August 4, 2024 11:23
    @pc-bob
    Copy link
    Contributor

    pc-bob commented Aug 5, 2024

    @mrT23 can we get a new docker image published with these changes? this would address #1086

    @pc-bob pc-bob mentioned this pull request Aug 5, 2024
    Closed
    @mrT23
    Copy link
    Collaborator Author

    mrT23 commented Aug 6, 2024 •
    edited
    Loading

    PR Code Suggestions ✨

    Latest suggestions up to ee1676c

    CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Score
    Best practice
    Specify the exception type in the except clause for better error handling

    The except: clause is too broad and may catch unexpected exceptions. Consider
    specifying the exact exception type you're expecting, such as ValueError.

    pr_agent/algo/git_patch_processing.py [229-231]

    -except:  # '@@ -0,0 +1 @@' case
+except ValueError:  # '@@ -0,0 +1 @@' case
     start1, size1, size2 = map(int, res[:3])
     start2 = 0
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8

    Why: This is an important suggestion for improving error handling and following best practices in exception management.

    		8
    Use a more stable tag for the base image to improve reproducibility

    Consider using a more specific tag for the Python base image instead of the latest
    patch version. This can help ensure reproducibility and avoid potential issues with
    future updates.

    docker/Dockerfile [1]

    -FROM python:3.12.3 AS base
+FROM python:3.12 AS base
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7

    Why: This suggestion improves reproducibility and stability of the Docker build process, which is important for consistent deployments.

    		7
    Maintainability
    Use a more descriptive variable name for clarity

    Consider using a more descriptive variable name instead of match. For example,
    hunk_header_match would better convey its purpose.

    pr_agent/algo/git_patch_processing.py [201]

    -match = RE_HUNK_HEADER.match(line)
+hunk_header_match = RE_HUNK_HEADER.match(line)
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6

    Why: The suggestion improves code readability by using a more descriptive variable name, which is a good practice but not critical.

    		6
    Performance
    Use a generator expression instead of a list comprehension inside the any() function

    Consider using a list comprehension instead of the any() function with a generator
    expression for better readability and potentially slightly improved performance.

    pr_agent/algo/git_patch_processing.py [206]

    -is_plus_lines = any([line.startswith('+') for line in new_content_lines])
+is_plus_lines = any(line.startswith('+') for line in new_content_lines)
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 5

    Why: This suggestion offers a minor performance improvement and slightly better readability, but the impact is relatively small.

    		5

    Previous suggestions

    Suggestions up to commit ee1676c
    CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Score
    Best practice
    Improve exception handling by specifying the exception type

    Replace the bare except: with a more specific exception handling to avoid catching
    unexpected exceptions, which can make debugging difficult.

    pr_agent/algo/git_patch_processing.py [229-231]

     try:
     start1, size1, start2, size2 = map(int, res[:4])
-except:  # '@@ -0,0 +1 @@' case
+except ValueError:  # Handle specific exception for integer conversion
     start1, size1, start2 = map(int, res[:3])
     start2 = 0
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 10

    Why: This suggestion improves the robustness and maintainability of the code by catching specific exceptions, making it easier to debug and preventing unintended exception handling.

    		10
    Performance
    Use generator expressions for better performance in checks

    Use a more Pythonic approach to check if any lines start with '+' or '-' by using
    generator expressions instead of list comprehensions for better performance.

    pr_agent/algo/git_patch_processing.py [245-251]

    -is_plus_lines = any([line.startswith('+') for line in new_content_lines])
-is_minus_lines = any([line.startswith('-') for line in old_content_lines])
+is_plus_lines = any(line.startswith('+') for line in new_content_lines)
+is_minus_lines = any(line.startswith('-') for line in old_content_lines)
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9

    Why: This suggestion improves performance and readability by using generator expressions, which are more efficient than list comprehensions for this use case.

    		9
    Move the list comprehension condition outside the loop for efficiency

    Optimize the list comprehension inside the loop by moving the condition outside the
    loop to prevent redundant checks.

    pr_agent/algo/git_patch_processing.py [245-249]

    -if new_content_lines:
-    is_plus_lines = any([line.startswith('+') for line in new_content_lines])
-    if is_plus_lines:
-        patch_with_lines_str = patch_with_lines_str.rstrip() + '\n__new hunk__\n'
-        for i, line_new in enumerate(new_content_lines):
-            patch_with_lines_str += f"{start2 + i} {line_new}\n"
+is_plus_lines = any(line.startswith('+') for line in new_content_lines)
+if is_plus_lines:
+    patch_with_lines_str = patch_with_lines_str.rstrip() + '\n__new hunk__\n'
+    for i, line_new in enumerate(new_content_lines):
+        patch_with_lines_str += f"{start2 + i} {line_new}\n"
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8

    Why: This suggestion enhances performance by reducing redundant checks inside the loop, making the code more efficient.

    		8
    ✅ Suggestions up to commit 3420e6f
    CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Score
    Best practice
    Replace broad exception handling with a specific exception type

    Replace the broad except clause with a more specific exception to avoid catching
    unintended exceptions and to make error handling more predictable.

    pr_agent/algo/git_patch_processing.py [229]

    -except:  # '@@ -0,0 +1 @@' case
+except ValueError:  # '@@ -0,0 +1 @@' case
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 10

    Why: Replacing a broad except clause with a specific exception type improves error handling and makes the code more predictable and maintainable.

    		10
    ✅ Use a more specific tag for the Docker base image
    Suggestion Impact:The commit implemented a more specific tag for the Python base image, although it used a different version (3.12.3) than the one suggested (3.12.0).

    code diff:

    -FROM python:3.12 AS base
+FROM python:3.12.3 AS base

    Specify a more explicit tag for the Python base image to ensure consistent builds
    across different environments.

    docker/Dockerfile [1]

    -FROM python:3.12 AS base
+FROM python:3.12.0 AS base
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7

    Why: Using a more specific tag for the Docker base image ensures consistency and predictability in builds, which is a good practice.

    		7
    Maintainability
    Refactor repetitive code into a function to handle hunk additions

    Avoid code duplication by creating a function to handle the addition of new and old
    hunks to patch_with_lines_str.

    pr_agent/algo/git_patch_processing.py [206-216]

    +def add_hunk_content(hunk_type, content_lines, start_index=None):
+    if hunk_type == 'new':
+        prefix = '__new hunk__'
+        line_format = f"{start_index + i} {line}\n" for i, line in enumerate(content_lines)
+    else:
+        prefix = '__old hunk__'
+        line_format = f"{line}\n" for line in content_lines
+    patch_with_lines_str = patch_with_lines_str.rstrip() + f'\n{prefix}\n' + ''.join(line_format)
+
 if is_plus_lines:
-    patch_with_lines_str = patch_with_lines_str.rstrip() + '\n__new hunk__\n'
-    for i, line_new in enumerate(new_content_lines):
-        patch_with_lines_str += f"{start2 + i} {line_new}\n"
+    add_hunk_content('new', new_content_lines, start2)
 if is_minus_lines:
-    patch_with_lines_str = patch_with_lines_str.rstrip() + '\n__old hunk__\n'
-    for line_old in old_content_lines:
-        patch_with_lines_str += f"{line_old}\n"
+    add_hunk_content('old', old_content_lines)
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9

    Why: Refactoring repetitive code into a function enhances maintainability and reduces the risk of errors.

    		9
    Performance
    Optimize the use of any() with a generator expression

    Use a list comprehension directly in the any() function to improve readability and
    performance.

    pr_agent/algo/git_patch_processing.py [206]

    -is_plus_lines = any([line.startswith('+') for line in new_content_lines])
+is_plus_lines = any(line.startswith('+') for line in new_content_lines)
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8

    Why: Using a generator expression in the any() function is more efficient and improves code readability.

    		8

    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Reviewers

    @CodiumAI-Agent CodiumAI-Agent CodiumAI-Agent approved these changes

    @hussam789 hussam789 hussam789 approved these changes

    Assignees
    No one assigned
    Labels
    documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request Review effort [1-5]: 3
    Projects
    None yet
    Milestone
    No milestone
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
    4 participants
    @mrT23 @pc-bob @hussam789 @CodiumAI-Agent